Mark Carney

Has never been elected before, so has no voting record.

ABORTION

Mark Carney supports child murder in the womb, framing the homicidal act of abortion as a "fundamental right".

On June 24, 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, allowing individual states to ban abortion, Carney complained bitterly, calling it "devastating" on Twitter:

"I’m proud to live in a country where a woman’s right to choose is so strongly supported. But the devastating decision today in the US is a clear reminder that progress should never be taken for granted. Our commitment to protecting fundamental rights must be unwavering" 

On March 23, 2025, Carney told reporters in a press conference, "I absolutely support a woman's right to choose, unreservedly, and will defend it as the Liberal Party has defended it, proudly and consistently".

Carney has also been an advocate for the problematic UN Sustainable Development Goals. For example, he called the SDGs "a moral imperative" during an April 2016 speech at the UN General Assembly. SDG goal # 5 includes wording about creating a right to abortion: "Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights". 

EUTHANASIA

While he has made no direct statements about euthanasia, it's reasonable to assume that he fully supports giving doctors the power to kill their patients via lethal injection, since he now leads the same Liberal Party that legalized this egregious form of homicide.

It's reasonable to presume that Carney is an adherent of radical transgender ideology, the un-scientific belief that being male or female is not related to biological reality, but rather, is something you can choose based on how you “feel” in your mind. According to this theory, gender is fluid like water and can change from day-to-day.

Carney's own daughter is a transgender activist who goes by the name "Sasha" (formerly Sophia), identifes as non-binary and uses "they/them" pronouns. Furthermore, a True North media investigation discovered that Carney sent her, while she was a young teen, to the discredited Tavistock Gender Clinic in the UK for transgender therapy. This infamous clinic was shut down for pushing hundreds of very young children into chemical and surgical sex changes. What kind of father would do that?

Further evidence of Carney's devotion to transgender ideology is the fact that he reacted angrily to President Trump's announcement that he'd be cutting federal funding to the DEI programs which have been spreading harmful transgender ideology across the U.S. and throughout the world. Carney responsed by promising to double down on woke ideology if he becomes Prime Minister, stating: "While America engages in a war on woke, Canadians will continue to value inclusiveness."

It's very clear that if Liberals win the 2025 election, it will mean more brainwashed and mutilated children, a continuing invasion of biological males into female sports, women's prisons, rape shelters, girls washrooms, changerooms and showers.

While there are no direct statements from Carney about homosexual "marriage", it's reasonable to assume that he fully supports this assault on God's plan for human sexuality and family life given that he now leads the very same party that in 2005, abolished the true definition of marriage as it had previously been enshrined in law, as the union of one man and one woman.

Carney also self-identified as a champion for all things "woke", which naturally includes the homosexual agenda. When Carney was Governor of the Bank of England, he flew the LGBT Pride flag in 2015, the first time in the bank's history.

One of the first funding announcements of the new Liberal government under Mark Carney was to hand out $2.1 million to seven LGBTQ activist organizations, in a March 21st press release.

Carney's Liberal Party does not permit a democratic nomination process. Carney is continuing Justin Trudeau's policy of banning pro-life Canadians from running as Liberal Party candidates due to their religious or moral opposition to abortion. This is a form of anti-religious discrimination directed against Christians, Jews and those of other faiths who believe that killing children before birth is morally wrong.

Likewise, Canadians seeking to become Liberal Party candidates will not be "green-lit" to proceed in the candidate nomination process if they happen to adhere to a biblical belief in marriage and human sexuality.

Finally, Carney's own 2025 leadership victory was highly suspect for fraud, as appproximatey 250,000 out of 400,000 party members were disqualified from voting in the Liberal leadership election, granting him a landslide win. It also came out that the Chinese Communist Party favoured Carney in the leadership race, and many suspect China may have conducted foreign interference by purchasing memberships to help Carney win.

Since Carney is leader of the Liberal Party, it's reasonable to assume that he strongly opposes the constitutional right to freedom of speech. It was the Liberal government who passed and introduced numerous laws which aim to censor speech and punish people with "hate crimes" for peacefully expressing their opinions (C-63), censor the internet (C-11, C-18), and even to compel citizens to utter government-mandated speech with which they disagree (C-16, C-6). 

Alarmingly, since becoming leader, Carney has attempted to exercise censorship control over journalists attempting to ask him questions about any potential conflicts of interest he may have, given his vast wealth and investments. Carney also kicked independent journalists out of his events and banned others from entering.

Another clue to Carney's pro-censorship leanings is that he was a longtime board member of the WEF, a totalitarian, globalist organization that has advocated for censorship control over individuals, the media and the internet.

Carney has not made any public statements on drugs, but due to his becoming leader of the Liberal Party, it's reasonable to assume he supports all the past drug legalization policies and legislation of the Trudeau Liberals which have caused so much destruction in Canadian cities, unprecedented crime and loss of life.

LEGALIZED CANNIBIS, THE "GATEWAY DRUG"

Carney's predecessor, Justin Trudeau campaigned on decriminalizing marijuana, the dangerous gateway drug to harder narcotics like crystal meth, cocaine, crack and heroin. Under the Liberal government's monstrous legislation, a child as young as 12-years old can now legally possess up to ten joints, and share them with friends. This is seriously destructive public policy which has dramatically increased the use of this addictive, mind-altering drug by young people, as witnessed by the fact that almost every strip mall and plaza in the country now houses a marijuana retail store.  This Liberal policy is also further lowering the already degraded morals of society.

PUSHING TO LEGALIZE ALL HARD DRUGS

Cannibis decriminilization is also setting the stage for the legalization of all drugs, including cocaine, heroin and fentanyl, as some Liberal MPs are already demanding. In fact, at the Liberal Party of Canada's 2018 policy convention in Halifax, party members passed a resolution to decriminalize possession and consumption of all illicit drugs, so this is the current policy of Carney's Liberal Party. It is clear that the Liberal Party is intent on creating a druggy culture in Canada.

50 DRUG INJECTION SITES OPENED BY LIBERAL GOVERNMENT

Following Trudeau's election in November 2015, Canada saw an explosion of government-sponsored drug injection sites, thanks to Liberal legislation designed to accelerate them being set up in cities all across Canada. As of 2025, between 48 to 53 drug consumption sites and so-called "overdose preventions sites" have been opened up under the Liberals.

The previous Conservative government (2006–2015) had imposed restrictive policies, including the 2015 Respect for Communities Act, which created barriers to approving new sites. The Liberals, upon taking office, signaled support for drug injection sites, streamlining the approval process through legislative changes, such as Bill C-37 in 2017. This policy shift, combined with the escalating opioid crisis, spurred a rapid increase in the establishment of drug consumption sites.

These filthy sites destroy the neighbourhoods in which they're planted, bring about an explosion in local crime, and result in economic destruction of the neighborhoods with shuttered businesses everywhere. However, business booms for drug gangs who've flourished as they prey upon the addicts that frequent the consumption sites.

The government then quickly escalated from merely providing a state-sponspored facility to legally snort/smoke/inject drugs, to actually handing out free, government-approved narcotics in the name of "safe supply". This has been a disastrous policy as the addicts have taken to reselling the "safe supply" drugs to kids so they can use that money to buy street drugs which give them a bigger kick. This has resulted in an even larger addiction crisis. As of 2023 figures, in BC alone, there has been a 388% increase in overdose deaths since 2015 when the Trudeau Liberals were first elected, rising from 514 deaths in 2015 to 2,511 deaths in 2023.
 

Due to Mark Carney taking over the Liberal leadership from Justin Trudeau, it is reasonable to presume that he supports the party's policies with respect to parental rights.

In 2015, the Trudeau Liberals committed to banning and criminalizing the traditional parenting technique of spanking, by repealing section 43 of the Criminal Code of Canada.That section is what protects the right of parents to use minor corporal discipline, like a spank, to enforce behavior.

Subsequently, a Liberal Senator introduced bill S-206, which, if passed, would have transformed loving parents into criminals. Giving a child a spank to enforce behavior, or even restraining the child until he calms down, would be treated as “child abuse” if S-206 had passed. Thanks to pushback by opposition Conservatives and parental rights advocates like Real Women, this bill died on the order paper in 2017, after passing second reading.

Despite this Liberal Senate bill dying for the time being, we recognize that the Liberal Party desires to jail parents – or have their children taken away by Children’s Aid - for utilizing this common, time-tested parenting practice of spanking, as one of many disciplinary tools that they employ to responsibly raise their children to be well-adjusted, respectful, law-abiding citizens.

It must be noted that Sweden’s ban on spanking in 1979 produced disastrous social results in  that country. Just like the activists pushing for a ban in Canada, those who did so in Sweden falsely claimed that traditional spanking leads to child abuse, and that banning it would reduce the instances of child abuse. The exact opposite happened in Sweden. The rate of physical assault on children exploded after the ban, doubling in the first year alone. As it turns out, Swedish parents no longer able to control their children’s behavior for fear of the law, eventually began exploding in rage and actually committing real physical assault.

Subsequent generations of Swedish children raised under the ban, themselves became dramatically more violent as youth, committing much more youth-on-youth violence compared to previous generations.

If Carney's Liberal party is ever allowed to succeed in its plan to ban spanking as a form of parental discipline, Canada will experience equally disastrous consequences to its social fabric, families, and to children themselves.