Candidate, John David (JD) Meaney
People's Party of Canada Party | Oakville, ON
CLC rating: Unknown
Light Rating
Rating Comments: No response to CLC's 2021 federal election questionnaire. This candidate also ran for the People's Party in Oakville during the 2019 federal election.
Percentage in last election: 3.2% (2021); 1.22% (2019)
Victory margin last election: -42.9% (2021); -45.06% (2019)
Religion / Faith: unknown
Parliamentary Office
Here is John David (JD) Meaney's voting record relating to life and family issues:
| Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision | Vote | Score |
|---|---|---|
| There are no votes, surveys or policy decisions to display for John David (JD) Meaney. | ||
There are no quotes for John David (JD) Meaney at this time.
Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by John David (JD) Meaney on September 3, 2021.
| Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Do you believe that life begins at conception (fertilization)? | no response |
| Do you support the conscience rights of health care professionals to refuse to do or refer for medical procedures which they oppose? | no response |
| If elected, would you vote in favour of a law to protect all unborn children from the time of conception (fertilization) onward? | no response |
| If elected, will you vote to pass laws protecting people from euthanasia and assisted-suicide, and vote to reject laws that would expand euthanasia and assisted-suicide? | no response |
| Are there any circumstances under which you believe a woman should have access to abortion? (note: Medical treatments to save the life of a mother and which result in the UNINTENDED death of her unborn child, are NOT abortions. Eg. in case of tubal pregnancy or cervical cancer) | no response |
There are no videos available for John David (JD) Meaney.
See John David (JD)'s opponents-
GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE -
RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE -
AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.